NZ Federation of Freshwater Anglers

Home
Don’t privatise the high country
Written by Hugh Barr   
Tuesday, 07 July 2009 12:19

Conservation and recreation groups are calling on the government to halt plans to privatise New Zealand’s high country.

Forest & Bird, the Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations, Federated Mountain Clubs, Public Access NZ and the NZ Federation of Freshwater Anglers fear the Government will sell Crown-owned land in the South Island high country into private ownership.

Recent comments by Minister of Agriculture David Carter that Crown-owned land currently held in pastoral leases would be sold into freehold ownership, with only covenants to protect some areas, have fuelled fears that the Government intends wide-scale privatization of the high country.

Adding to those fears are comments by Associate Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson that 30% of New Zealand’s land already in the conservation estate was “enough” and that the government could not afford to purchase properties to create new high country parks.

Forest & Bird General Manager Mike Britton says the process of tenure review, and purchases through the Nature Heritage Fund, have in recent times contributed to significant protection of

the high country.  The creation of high country parks has protected vulnerable ecosystems and native species, and has guaranteed public access.

“We have made good progress in protecting our iconic high country landscapes and wildlife, but we risk losing those gains if the government goes ahead with its plans to put the high country into private ownership.”

Mike Britton says covenants have value in protecting small areas of vulnerable habitats on private land, but are not suitable for use on public land where public access and recreation must also be protected.

Secretary of Outdoor Recreation Associations Hugh Barr says covenants do not provide public access or allow public involvement in management of the land, not do they encourage development of facilities such as huts and tracks.

“New Zealand’s draconian trespass laws prohibit public access to private land even when covenants are in place,” he says.

The unspoilt wilderness of the high country is a major drawcard for international tourists, bringing in millions of dollars in tourism revenue.  Selling it into private ownership would threaten its natural character through inappropriate development and inadequate protection, reducing its tourism value.

Under proposals being discussed as part of a review of government policy, mountain peaks could be privatized, even sub-divided and sold into foreign ownership.

The conservation and recreation groups said it was vital that the high country was protected for the enjoyment of future generations, not sold off.

“New Zealand’s high country is one of its most special and iconic natural assets, and should remain in public ownership for the enjoyment of all and protection of its unique plants and animals – it shouldn’t be sold off.”

Contact:

Mike Britton, Forest & Bird, 04 801 2216, 021 783 776

Hugh Barr, Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations, 027 686 0063

 
Hydro scheme feasibility study on hold
Written by HELEN MURDOCH - Nelson - The Press   
Tuesday, 04 August 2009 09:45

A $1 million feasibility study on a proposed hydro scheme for Murchison's Matakitaki River has been put on hold.

 

Electricity retailer Network Tasman was to announce yesterday whether it would go ahead with the study.

 

However, chief executive Wayne Mackey said public consultation had raised some issues and it could be two years before a decision was made.

Network Tasman is considering developing up to four hydro dams on the Matakitaki, a popular kayaking river.

 

Whitewater New Zealand conservation officer Tony Ward-Holmes said it provided feedback from more than 200 kayakers opposing the proposal.

He said an early study had not taken environmental, economic and recreational factors into account.

 

Network Tasman had also used old river-flow data, he said.

 

Ward-Holmes said it was likely Network Tasman was waiting for the second phase of resource management plan amendments that could ease the project's consent process.

 

"This would be the greatest loss of a recreational amenity to power generation in the country, and we will fight it to the death."

Last Updated on Tuesday, 04 August 2009 09:46
 
Foreshore and Sea Bed Issue a 'Divisive Minefield'
Written by Tony Orman   
Thursday, 02 July 2009 11:36

The resurgence of debate over the foreshore and seabed ownership is a divisive minefield says the Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations of New Zealand (CORANZ).
   CORANZ co-chairman Steve Veail says the Treaty of Waitangi was a 50-50 partnership treaty between two cultures, Maori and European designed to create a united culture and society of the future.


       "The granting of ownership to just one ethnic group is against the spirit of the Treaty," he said.
      Mr Veail rejected any likely accusations of racism.
     "CORANZ would be expressing concerns if ownership was given to just indigenous non-Maori New Zealanders," he said.
      He said ownership arguments were futile and unrealistic since there are no full-blooded Maori families in New Zealand.


  Talk of injustices and grievances of 150 years ago were equally futile. Injustices have happened between Maori and Maori and pre-Maori tribes, between Europeans and Europeans.

        "We are all Kiwis. We must  go forward as one," said Mr Veail.
 
Issued by Tony Orman, publicity officer CORANZ
 
Contact : Steve Veail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Phone: 04 4797404
41 Huntleigh Parkway, Ngaio, Wellington
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 3

NZFFA Forum Latest

More...
NZ Federation of Freshwater Anglers Template by Ahadesign Powered by Joomla! feed-image Feed Entries